*SIGH*
Every other blog in the universe is going nuts over the toilet flushing of the sacred document story. It's tempting to stay out of the discussion entirely. However, if you know me at all, you know that just isn't going to happen.
When did journalists stop checking sources? I guess I come from the old school. One source does not make the story in most cases. And, I highly doubt that the "source" in question is of the caliber of deep throat.
A complete and lengthy discussion of the current state of the journalism profession is past due. PR practitioners have lead the charge in discussing openly the ethical concerns that have come into focus recently regarding our industry. It is time for that same discussion to take place in newsrooms throughout this country.
These are more than "honest mistakes." These are critical signs pointing to disturbing trends. Those trends include the over zealous take over of the industry by huge, greedy media conglomerates, the continued emergence of "new media" outlets which rarely do the tedious background work required of sound journalism and a culture so obsessed with instant gratification that they will believe practically anything you put in front of them.
Some have said that the stir surrounding this story is a bit much. If this had been an isolated incident, I would tend to agree. But, it's the fact that we are dealing with a series of events that concerns me.
The fact is, nothing is going to change until, we, the American consumers of information, demand something different. The heads of these mega-conglomerates aren't going to do anything to change the state of their industry until we hit them where it matters to them - in their pocket books. How do we do that? I'm not sure. Have any ideas?